Kazakh Kashagan: Who is guilty and what to do

By Elena Kosolapova
Kazakh Kashagan oil and gas field was expected to be one of the
most profitable projects in the world but has become a great
disappointment for the country and its operators.
Kashagan is one of the largest oil and gas fields of the world. The
total oil reserves of the field amounts to 38 billion barrels,
while some 10 billion out of them are recoverable reserves.
Moreover there are large natural gas reserves at the Kashagan field
- over one trillion cubic meters.
The field is being developed by North Caspian Operating Company
(NCOC) which is formed now by Italian Eni, Kazakh KMG Kashagan
B.V.( KazMunaiGas subsidiary), French Total, U.S. ExxonMobil, Royal
Dutch Shell, each of which owns 16.81 percent share, Chinese CNPC-
8.4 percent and Japanese Inpex- 7.56 percent.
Among the field's developers were such companies as U.S.
ConocoPhillips, British Petroleum, Norwegian Statoil, British BG
Group, U.S. Phillips Petroleum which sold there stakes in the
project earlier.
Thus the most experienced and reputable world companies worked and
are working at the field.
However, the project has been experiencing a lot of projects since
the very beginning of its development. The field has experienced
several delays in oil production since 2005. Moreover the project
has considerably grown in price and became the most expensive
energy project in the world, according to the CNN Money rating.
Eventually oil production at Kashagan launched in September 2013
was totally unsuccessful.
Oil production at the field was launched on September 11, 2013 and
was suspended on September 24, though following detection of gas
leak in the onshore section of the gas pipeline running from D
Island to the onshore processing facility Bolashak. Oil production
was resumed on October 6 as the affected joint was repaired and
stopped again on October 9 after another seep was detected. The
direct cause of pipeline leaks was cracking under the influence of
sulfide compounds, according to the preliminary results. If these
results are confirmed the project operator will have to replace the
entire pipeline system from the field to the onshore processing
facility. Such repair works will require a lot of time and
money.
Kazakhstan's environment ministry announced it would impose a fine
of 134.2 billion tenge ($737 million) on the NCOC consortium and
Agip KCO, operating the project, because of damage to the
environment caused by a gas leak.
The questions are how could such experienced companies fail in
their calculation of project's price, time of development and
possible problems? Why the pipes chosen by these companies turned
out unsuitable for Kashagan oil? And what could be done to resolve
the situation?
Kazakh ecologist and member of the advisory board of the Caspian
Sea Rescue Fund, Serikjan Mambetalin believes that technologies for
Kashagan development do not exist yet.
"The best Japanese pipes were chosen for the project... But even
such pipes could not sustain pressure, temperature and aggressive
environment at the field and influence of mercaptan and sulfur
containing in its oil," Mambetalin told Trend.
He noted that oil production specialists all over the world assess
Kashagan as the most complicated field due to its location in
shallow water, freezing of waters and movement of ice in this
region, high pressure and aggressive and poisonous content of its
oil.
Kashagan project was originally on the verge of adventurism,
Mambetalin believes.
He reminded that the northern part of the Caspian was recognized as
conservation area in the Soviet times. Soviet ecologists new that
that there were a huge oil field in the northern part of the
Caspian Sea even in 1970s, according to Mambetalin. But they
understood that this field's structure is as complicated as the
structure of the other large Kazakh field Tengiz located on
shore.
"After fire at Tengiz's 37th well in 1985 which could not be
extinguished for a year, specialists realized that it was better
not to touch oil in the Caspian Sea northern part. Because if they
cannot stop fire in the bare steppe, what will happen in the sea,"
he said.
Expert believes the companies engaged in Kashagan development knew
the risks of the project from the very beginning. However since
northern part of the Caspian Sea is an area of geopolitical
interest for many countries it was important for multinational
companies not to be late in getting of a piece of this field.
Serikjan Mambetalin on behalf of Kazakh ecologist urges Kazakh
Government to ban oil production in northern Caspian Sea for
several years to prevent ecological disaster. He thinks that
Kashagan developers should also be interested in such scenario
because their losses from possible oil spills at Kashagan will be
comparable with the losses of BP after oil spill in the Mexican
Gulf in 2010.
"Bioresources of the Caspian Sea are worth $2 trillion and in case
of large-scale environmental disaster at Kahsagan, its developers
will not have enough money to reimburse damage to other Caspian
countries. Safe technologies [for Kashagan development] will be
invented but not today and not tomorrow. Maybe in 20 years," he
said.
Senior analyst of the Agency for Research of Investments
Profitability Murat Abulgazin also believes Kashagan is of
geopolitical interests for many countries.
"Kashagan field due to huge hydrocarbons reserves influence the
world's oil and gas policy, and will be able to radically change
the balance of geopolitical powers in Eurasia and the world in case
of full development and production. The western companies just
"staked out" Kashagan field in the 1990s. But since these companies
have other available sources around the world they did not hastened
to develop it. Caspian hydrocarbons are more of commercial rather
than of consumer interest for them," Abulgazin told Trend.
Due to several delays the pipes were in the aggressive environment
of the Caspian Sea for a long time and corroded as a result. This
corrosion caused the leaks at the field, he thinks.
Expert believes that involvement of real hydrocarbon consumers such
as China and India in the project will help to resolve Kashagan's
problems and fasten its development. Some steps in this direction
have been already taken. Chinese CNPC joined the NCOC consortium
developing the field in 2013. Indian ONGC also shows great interest
for Kashagan and wanted to buy a stake in the project.
Meanwhile Kazakh authorities give no specific forecasts concerning
oil production at Kashagan.
In early March head of Kazakh National Oil and Gas Company
KazMunaiGas Sauat Mynbayev, said the restart of Kashagan would
probably happen in the second half of this year.
"However, we should speak about it in terms of probability, and I
withhold comments on the volume of extraction yet," he said.
Earlier forecasts of Kazakh authorities concerning Kashagan were
much more optimistic and certain. In particular the country
intended to enter the top ten largest oil-producing countries due
Kashagan oil. Now these plans are delayed to long term.
Thus the future of Kashagan remains unclear at least until
announcement of the final results of the incident
investigation.
Here we are to serve you with news right now. It does not cost much, but worth your attention.
Choose to support open, independent, quality journalism and subscribe on a monthly basis.
By subscribing to our online newspaper, you can have full digital access to all news, analysis, and much more.
You can also follow AzerNEWS on Twitter @AzerNewsAz or Facebook @AzerNewsNewspaper
Thank you!