New mechanism needed to resolve Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
By Nazrin Gadimova
When the situation in the occupied Nagorno-Karabakh region has
exploded unexpectedly following Armenia’s provocation, the most
expected was the response of the OSCE Minsk Group, the only
mediator in resolution of the conflict.
Over the entire period of its existence, the OSCE MG has not
managed to determine ways to resolve the long-lasting
Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict fairly. Moreover, over the four days,
the OSCE MG co-chairs have failed to take any decisive action that
could play a role in reducing the tensions.
The MG co-chairs come together only on April 5 at a special meeting
of the OSCE Permanent Council in Vienna. Ambassador James Warlick,
representing the three Co-Chairs of the Minsk Group, and the
Personal Representative of the Chairperson-in-Office, Ambassador
Andrzej Kasprzyk, informed the OSCE participating states about
recent developments in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.
Warlick and Kasprzyk stressed that it is important to return to the
political process on the basis of a sustainable ceasefire, while
the OSCE participating states agreed that the latest escalation is
deeply worrying and that it is necessary for the OSCE to continue
playing a central role in facilitating a peaceful settlement.
The Co-Chairs together with Ambassador Kasprzyk travelled to the
regions shortly after the Vienna meeting. Azerbaijan’s President
Ilham Aliyev and Defense Minister Zakir Hasanov received the
co-chairs on April 6 to discuss the recent escalation.
Following the talks, the co-chairs noted that the negotiations over
the Nagorno-Karabakh problem should become intensive and decisive
step should be taken towards a peace settlement.
The OSCE Minsk Group has brought a message to Baku and will
bring to Yerevan about the need for immediate ceasefire in order to
create an environment where progress can be made on the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict's settlement, the Minsk Group's US
Co-chair James Warlick told reporters in Baku.
Warlick said comprehensive settlement means withdrawal of Armenian
armed forces from the occupied territories and the return of those
territories to Azerbaijan, and also it means that the parties must
deal with the issue of status for Nagorno-Karabakh.
Although the statements made by the co-chairs seem to be more
decisive than ever, experts believe that a new mechanism for the
settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is needed. The MG
co-chairs have preoccupied themselves on talks only, forgetting
about actions.
Justin Amler, an Australian writer and observer, believes that the
Minsk Group, chaired by France, Russia and the United States has
proven itself to be a failure.
“A new mechanism needs to be found to deal with the conflict
that allows Azerbaijani sovereignty to be restored as well as
consideration for those Armenians living there,” he wrote in his
article issued on Washington Times.
Experts believe that to achieve a progress in the peace talks on
the conflict it is necessary to change the format of OSCE MG. They
suppose that the co-chairs should confess their failure and resign.
Other mediators or the conflicting sides themselves should deal
with the problem, they say.
The Minsk Group, to somehow justify its importance and
significance, takes random acts, trying to create illusion of
importance and to impose its will on other international
institutions.
"It is time to change its format, to attract new mediators,
perhaps, such as Turkey and Kazakhstan,” Kazakh expert Aydos Sarym
told Trend.
But, Russia, which is represented in the MG, is opposed to changing
the format of the "troika" and believes that attempts to undermine
Russia’s role are counterproductive.
"The format of the “troika”, whose role is enshrined in OSCE
decisions and UN Security Council, is efficient and does not
require adjustments,” stressed Aleksandr Lukashevich, Russia’s
Permanent Representative to the OSCE.
The OSCE Minsk Group acted as the only mediator in resolution of
the conflict, proceeding talks based on the renewed Madrid
principles. The statements promising a sincere contribution to the
peaceful resolution of the conflict have become frequent, but
declarative in essence.
The very attitude broke confidence in success of the mediators
representing the U.S., Russia and France.
In 1994, the OSCE Budapest Summit established the so-called Minsk
Group, which is co-chaired by France, the Russian Federation, and
the United States. The group’s permanent members are Belarus,
Germany, Italy, Sweden, Finland, and Turkey, as well as Armenia and
Azerbaijan.
--
Nazrin Gadimova is AzerNews’ staff journalist, follow her on Twitter: @NazrinGadimova
Follow us on Twitter @AzerNewsAz
Here we are to serve you with news right now. It does not cost much, but worth your attention.
Choose to support open, independent, quality journalism and subscribe on a monthly basis.
By subscribing to our online newspaper, you can have full digital access to all news, analysis, and much more.
You can also follow AzerNEWS on Twitter @AzerNewsAz or Facebook @AzerNewsNewspaper
Thank you!